Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12488 (JHR)

RAJU SARKAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2580/2026 · 2026-05-14

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15000 --1-- A.B.A. No. 2580 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2580 of 2026 ---- 1.Raju Sarkar, aged about 21 years, son of Mangal Sarkar, resident of village – Mahua Danga, Ward No.3, Hiranpur, PO and PS – Pakur (Town), District – Pakur, Jharkhand 2.Bapan Sarkar, aged about 22 years, son of Biren Sarkar, resident of village – Mahua Danga, Ward No.3, Hiranpur, PO and PS – Pakur (Town), District – Pakur, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Advocate ---- 02/14.05.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No.16 of 2026 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 189(2), 189(3), 189(4), 189(5), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 221, 222, 132, 285, 126(2), 326(g), 324(3), 324(5), 62 and 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Pakur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a mob was assembled at the spot due to the road accident, in which, one person has died. He next submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against 500-600 persons. He further submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-9 of the petition. He next submits that in 2026:JHHC:15000 --2-- A.B.A. No. 2580 of 2026 identical situation co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in ABA Nos.1374 of 2026 and 1353 of 2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioners are named in the FIR. 5. Considering that a mob was assembled at the spot, pursuant to a road accident, in which, one person has died and further from perusal of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations against 500-600 persons and the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-9 of the petition and in identical situation co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABA, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Pakur in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No.16 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 14.05.2026 Sangam/