Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1- NOB-9-BA-1699-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1699 OF 2026 SAGAR SHRAWAN BHOSALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sagar Mahale h/f. Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar a/w Chaudhari Dhananjay Rajendra APP for Respondents/State : Mr. D.J. Patil ...
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT :
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
2. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that, he has instructions to withdraw the bail application with liberty to file a fresh application.
3. The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that, applicant was initially released on bail, however, he was subsequently arrested after issuance of a non-bailable warrant. The bail application was earlier rejected on the ground that the charges were not framed and liberty was granted to prefer fresh application after framing of charges. He submits that, charges have already been framed, and therefore, the cause for filing fresh application has arisen before the learned Trial Court on this ground. Therefore, he seeks withdrawal. 2026:BHC-AUG:43914
-2- NOB-9-BA-1699-2026
4. Permission to withdraw the application is granted.
5. A fresh application, if filed on the ground that the charges have already been framed, be considered by the learned Trial Court on its own merits.
6. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale