Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12482 (KAR)

SUBBALAKSHMAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/2165/2024 · 2026-02-16

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9546 WP No. 2165 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 2165 OF 2024 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. SUBBALAKSHMAMMA W/O GURURAYADU AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS 2. VENKATAMMA D/O JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS 3. AHALYA D/O GURURAYADU AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING OF KEMPADHALLI VILLAGE, KORA HOBLI, TUMKUR (DIST) AND (TALUK) - 572 128 4. MADAVA MURTHY S/O GURURAYADU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.298, GURURJA KRUPA, 17TH CROSS, 32ND MAIN ROAD, J.P.ROAD, 6TH CROSS, BENGALURU - 560 078. (ALL ARE LR'S OF SMT. JAYAMMA (DECEASED)). …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KIRAN B.S, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9546 WP No. 2165 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 101. 3. THE THASILDAR TUMKUR DISTRICT. 4. KARIYAMMA W/O PATEL HALGEGOWDA NADHIHALLI GRAMA, KORA HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK - 572 128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 4.2.2023 PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL IN PROCEEDING NO. OLRM.NO. 11-22/75-76 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 02.02.2026, the following order was passed: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9546 WP No. 2165 of 2024 "Finally, two weeks time is granted at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners for compliance of office objections. Re-list this matter on 16.02.2026. If office objections are not complied by the next date of hearing, the writ petition will be dismissed." 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1