Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12481 (GAU)

BHIM PROJA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

I.A.(Crl.)/799/2026 · 2026-08-11

Michael Zothankhuma, Shamima Jahan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010161952026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/799/2026 BHIM PROJA SON OF DASHARATH PROJA, RESIDENT OF HATIGARH TEA ESTATE C BLOCK, P.S HARISINGA, DISTRICT UDALGURI, ASSAM - 784510. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. 2:GANESH SASONI SON OF GOURANGO SASONI RESIDENT OF MAJULI TEA ESTATE P.S HARISINGA DISTRICT UDALGURI ASSAM - 78451 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A ATREYA, MR. J KONWAR,MR D K BHATTACHARYYA,MS. C KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 12.08.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) 1. Heard Mr. D.K. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 1265 days in filing the appeal against the Page No.# 2/2 conviction of the applicant under Section 366A IPC read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act. 2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. 3. Accordingly, the delay of 1265 days is condoned. 4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. 5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant