2026:JHHC:13247 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2080 of 2026 Surabhi Rani Gupta aged about 30 years wife of Ashutosh Kumar R/O- Belabagan, Deoghar, P.S: Deoghar, Dist-Deoghar, Jharkhand ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.Chief General Manager, The Indian Bank Head Office, PB No. 5555,254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014, P.O + P.S: Rayapettah 2. The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Baharampur Kadai Branch, P.O+P.S: Baharampur 3. The Vigilance Department, The Indian Bank, Disciplinary Authority Zonal Office, Behrampur, First floor, Gour Sunder Bhavan, NH34, Panchanantala, Berhampore, Murshidabad, West Bengal – 742101 P.O+P.S: Baharampur 4. The Zonal Manager, Indian Bank Zonal office, Behrampore, P.O + P.S: Bahrampur 5. Kumud Ranjan, The Indian Bank Zonal office, Bahrampur Assistant, General Manager/Disciplinary Authority, P.O +P.S:Baharampur 6. The HR Department, The Indian Bank, Zonal office First floor, Gour sunder Bhavan, NH34, Panchanantala, Behrampore, Murshidabad West Bengal 742101 P.O +P.S: Baharampur ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arbind Kumar, Advocate Mr. Amit Nishant, Advocate Ms. Sakshi Diksha, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate [through V.C] -------- Order No. 07 /Dated: 4th May 2026 I.A No. 3897 of 2026 This application has been preferred by the petitioner for making amendment in paragraph no. 1 and prayer portion of the instant writ application. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not raise objection. 3. Looking to the averments made in this application, I.A No. 3897 of 2026:JHHC:13247 2 2026 is allowed. 4. Let this I.A be treated as part of the main writ application for future reference. W.P.(S) No. 2080 of 2026 5. With the consent of the parties the matter is taken up for hearing today itself. 6. Looking to the prayer made in this writ application along with the proposed amendment it appears that a chargesheet has been issued against the petitioner. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly admits before this Court that a chargesheet has been issued against the petitioner; however, no punishment order has been passed. Accordingly, in view of the aforesaid fact, this Court is not inclined to intervene in midst of the departmental proceeding and the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the departmental proceeding and the competent authority is at liberty to proceed in accordance with their own regulation and complete the departmental proceeding. 8. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the final order of the departmental proceeding, if it is against him. 9. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ application stands disposed of. 10. Pending I.As., if any, also stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 4th April 2026 Amit Uploaded on 15/05/2026