HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13444 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 7.7.2026. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though the petitioner was initially appointed as a driver and after the retirement of one Murari Lal, who was earlier working as a driver, the charge of government vehicle has been given to the petitioner. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner being medically unfit, he cannot drive the vehicle in question. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the petitioner may represent his grievance before respondent no.3 along with all evidence in support of his case within ten days and same shall be considered by respondent no.3 itself. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of at this stage, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation along with all medical papers before respondent no.3 and if such a representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided sympathetically by respondent no.3 within next four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, provided there is no other legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madhu Ranjan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Yaspal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the matter on merits of the case. October 7, 2026 Kumar Manish WRIA No. 13444 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad