SANJEEV NAGAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIC/40243/2026 · 2026-10-04
Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40243 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing of the notice dated
20.8.2026.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has replied to the notice and the petitioner apprehends that without any decision, the construction shall be demolished.
3. As the petitioner has filed his reply to the notice, it is expected that the reply to the notice shall be considered and a final decision be taken. Pursuant to the decision, the demolition can be effected, if required.
4. Accordingly, we direct that the reply of the petitioner shall be considered and thereafter a reasoned order would be passed. The entire exercise shall be done within a period of 4 weeks. It is further provided that for a period of 4 weeks or until a decision is taken, whichever is earlier, no demolition shall take place.
5. The writ petition is disposed of. October 5, 2026 Irshad Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Pandey, Ramesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Sanjeev Nagar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRSHAD AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad