Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12472 (GAU)

SRI ABU SAYED MONDAL v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

WP(C)/3819/2026 · 2026-08-11

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010149432026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3819/2026 SRI ABU SAYED MONDAL SON OF ABDUR RAHMAN MONDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ABRARBHITA, P.O.- BALARBHITA, P.S.- BAGUAN, DISTRICT- GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN 783129. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE DIRECTOR INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT ASSAM ULUBARI . GUWAHATI-7 DIST.- KAMRUP M ASSAM 4:THE CHAIRPERSON ASSAM INLAND WATER TRANSPORT REGULATORY AUTHORITY ULUBARI GUWAHATI-7 DIST.- KAMRUP M ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 5:THE DEPARTMENTAL TENDER COMMITTEE FOR SETTLEMENT OF FERRY SERVICES PURSUANT TO NIT DATED 31.12.2025 REPRESENTED BY THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DIVISION ULUBARI GUWAHATI-7 DIST.- KAMRUP M ASSAM 6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER GOALPARA DISTRICT-GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783101 7:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BALIJANA REVENUE CIRCLE DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN 783101 8:SRI JYOTIRMOY SINGHA SON OF SRI RATNESWAR SINGHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PACHIM MATIA P.O. AND P.S.- MATIA DIST. GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-78312 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M HUSSAIN, MR H MAZUMDER,MR. W RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, FOR CAVEATOR,MR. S HAZARIKA,SC, IWT,SC, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, ASSAM Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 12.08.2026 Heard Mr. W. Rahman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. D. Bora, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Transport Department and Mr. S. Hazarika, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 8. Mr. W. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has received instructions from his client not to press the instant writ petition and accordingly, seeks withdrawal of the same. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn. Interim order, if any, passed earlier accordingly stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant