HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3668 of 2026 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicant and Mr. Anupam Anand, learned Brief Holder for the State. Perused the material on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Session Case No.04 of 2026 (State v. Jitendra @ Jitu Samrath and others), arising out of Case Crime No.0020 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 127(2), 308(5) B.N.S., Police Station- Kotwali, Orai, District- Jalaun, during the pendency of trial. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Vague and general allegations have been levelled against the applicant. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to establish that any amount was paid as extortion to the applicant and other co-accused. The injuries received by the injured were simple in nature. Investigation has been completed. Charge-sheet has been filed. During investigation, the applicant was granted anticipatory bail till submission of police report, by this Court vide order dated 4.4.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.2538 of 2025 (Golu alias Ranveer vs. State of U.P.). The Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankur Vishwakarma, Tanzila Parveen Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Golu @ Ranveer .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Through Secretary(Home) U.P., Lucknow And Another .....Opposite Party(s) applicant had cooperated in the investigation. The applicant has been summoned by the concerned Court. No custodial interrogation is required. Further, the applicant has not violated any conditions or misused the liberty of anticipatory bail. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in paragraph-26 of the bail application. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned Brief Holder for the State and counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant, and the fact that vague and general allegations have been levelled against the applicant. At this stage, there is no substantive evidence to establish that any amount was paid as extortion to the applicant and other co-accused. The injuries received by the injured were simple in nature. Investigation has been completed and charge sheet has been filed. During investigation, the applicant was granted anticipatory bail till submission of police report. No violation of the conditions or misuse of liberty of anticipatory bail has been pointed out by the learned A.G.A. The applicant had cooperated in the investigation; the applicant has been summoned by the concerned court, no custodial interrogation is required; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant Golu @ Ranveer, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall make himself available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; NABAIL No. 3668 of 2026 2 (ii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. April 20, 2026 Manish Kr NABAIL No. 3668 of 2026 3 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad