1 2026:CGHC:19255 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1977 of 2026 Ashok Choudhari S/o Sukdev Choudhari, Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Bhithidih, Tah. Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The Registrar Firms And Society, State Of Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Deputy Registrar, Firms And Societies, State Of Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The President ( Smt. Usha Patel), Akhil Bharatiya Aghariya Samaj, Kendriya Samiti Raigarh, Kotra Road, Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Vishnucharan Patel, Zonal Incharge, Pithora Zonal, Village Arbichpimen, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 5 - Ramesh Patel, S/o Shri Munudau Patel, R/o Ward 13 Pithora District Mahasmund (C.G.) 6 - The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Deputy Secretary, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 27.04.2026 1. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs :- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court, may kindly call for the entire record in relates to the case of the Petitioner. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.04.28 10:23:36 +0530 2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court, may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 02 to decide the pending petition dated 19.03.2026 (Ann P-1) filed by the Petitioner, within stipulated period, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief, this Hon'ble Court, derem fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the Petitioner, in the interest of Justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application under challenge has already been decided by the authorities, as such, he does not wish to pursue the present petition. 3. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid submission. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh