ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. KHABIR UDDIN AND ANR.
I.A.(Civil)/2860/2026 · 2026-08-23
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12465 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12465 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010136742026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2860/2026 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI, G.S. ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER, GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI 781007. VERSUS KHABIR UDDIN AND ANR. S/O AMZAD ALI, R/O. VILLAGE - BHERALDI, P. O. - BHELLA, P.S. - BARPETA, DISTRICT - BARPETA, ASSAM. PIN -781309 2:SADDAM JAMADAR S/O SIDDIQUE JAMADAR R/O. VILLAGE - GALIA P.O. - GALIA P.S. - HOWLY DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM. PIN -78135 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P SHARMA, MS. C MOZUMDAR,MS. R D MOZUMDAR Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : MACApp./0/0 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI G.S. ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE ULUBARI GUWAHATI 781007
Page No.# 2/2 VERSUS KHABIR UDDIN S/O AMZAD ALI R/O. VILLAGE - BHERALDI P. O. - BHELLA P.S. - BARPETA DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM. PIN -781309 2:SADDAM JAMADAR OWNER /O SIDDIQUE JAMADAR R/O. VILLAGE - GALIA P.O. - GALIA P.S. - HOWLY DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM. PIN -781352 Advocate for : Samujjal Pratim Sharma Advocate for : appearing for KHABIR UDDIN
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 24.08.2026
Heard Ms. R D Mozumdar, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 82 days in preferring the connected appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. This Court is of the opinion that going for issuing notice to the respondent would be nothing but sheer waste of time. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list the same for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant