Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12465 (ALL)

RAVINDRA NATH RAI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/40683/2026 · 2026-10-06

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40683 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Prayer for removal of encroachment by this Court at the first instance cannot be decided being disputed fact. However, petitioner is still at liberty to file an application or to institute proceedings in terms of relevant provisions before the appropriate authority and in case if any application is filed, same may be decided in accordance with law. 3. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with aforesaid liberty. October 7, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishi Kant Rai, Shashank Shekhar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ravindra Nath Rai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad