MUKESH KUMAR ALIAS MUKESH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2980/2026 · 2026-05-13
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12462 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12462 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:14707 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2980 of 2026
------ Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Yadav, aged about 21 years, son of Murli Yadav, resident of Village-Chitarpoka, P.S.-Mohanpur, P.O.-Ghormara, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.04 Dated- 13.05.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jamtara P.S. Case No.137 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of Arms Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery and caused hurt to the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him on T.I. Parade, charge sheet has been submitted in this case; as has been mentioned in paragraph no.03 of the supplementary affidavit dated 07.05.2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed
petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamtara, in connection with Jamtara P.S. Case No.137 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
13.05.2026 Gunjan-