HAZARI LAL PAREEK S/O SHRI BARDI PRASAD v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/15019/2026 · 2026-08-11
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12461 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12461 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:31510] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15019/2026 CNR: RJHC020660822026 | URN: CW / 31997U / 2026 Hazari Lal Pareek S/o Shri Bardi Prasad, Aged About 71 Years, R/o A-423, J.d.a. Colony, Naradpura, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, CBS Depot, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankul Gupta with Mr. Rahul Ghiya For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 11/08/2026
1. Upon bare perusal of the material available on record, it is observed at the outset that the present writ petition is not maintainable, as the prayer sought herein has already been adjudicated upon vide order dated 02.08.2019 (Annexure-1) passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8539/2019 titled Hazari Lal Pareek v. RSRTC & Ors.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been repeatedly pursuing his case, but on account of severe financial distress, he has not received the monetary relief, despite an order having been passed in this regard by the respondent- RSRTC.
[2026:RJ-JP:31510] (2 of 2) [CW-15019/2026]
3. Having heard the submissions advanced by learned counsel, this Court is of the view that since the matter stands already adjudicated, no further directions can be issued in the present writ petition. However, it is made clear that if the earlier order dated 02.08.2019 is not complied with by the respondents within the period of 90 days from the date of passing of this order, the petitioner shall be at liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings in accordance with the law.
4. With the aforesaid observations and liberty, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J 11/Prateek