Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12460 (CAL)

MD ZIAUDDIN v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/741/2026 · 2026-04-27

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27.04.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 150. Kausik CRM (M) 741 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Topsia Police Station Case No. 167 of 2025 dated 3rd November, 2025 under Section 109 of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Md. Ziauddin ……Petitioner. Mr. Daanish Haque Mr. Abdul Zahid ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Arijit Ganguly Ms. Pritha Paul ……for the State. Petitioner was arrested on or about 3rd November, 2025 and since then he is in custody in custody. Learned advocate submits that charge sheet has already been submitted. Case has been committed. As such, further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted in the facts of the present case. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the period of detention of the present petitioner which is more than 6 months as well as the stage of the case. Having regard to the totality of the 2 circumstances, I direct the learned Trial Court to release the petitioner on bail after the stage of overcoming the charges. Learned Trial Court while granting bail to the petitioner, will impose amongst others, the condition of not to enter the jurisdiction of Topsia Police Station. Let the charges be framed either on the next date or within a period of 30 days from the next date fixed by the learned Trial court. With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 741 of 2026 is disposed of. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)