Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1246 (UTT)

SADAB v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/252/2026 · 2026-02-06

Siddhartha Sah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.252 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan (through V.C.), learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.N. Maulekhi, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent nos.1 to 3. 3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. 4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above. [ (Siddhartha Sah, J.) Vacation Judge 06.02.2026 Ravi