MADHAV RAMESH CHAUDHARI v. 1 THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TAPI PATBANDHARE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL
CA/11123/2026 · 2026-09-24
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12459 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12459 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 965-CA.11106-26 (965-968).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11106 OF 2026 IN FAST/15415/2024 PRAVIN RAMDAS ATTARDE DIED THROUGH LRS I PUSHPA PRAVIN ATTARDE VERSUS 1 THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TAPI PATBANDHARE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL JALGON WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11107 OF 2026 IN FAST/15412/2024 AND 967 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11119 OF 2026 IN FAST/15268/2024 RAMESH WAMAN KINKAR VERSUS 1 THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TAPI PATBANDHARE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL JALGAON WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11121 OF 2026 IN FAST/15271/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11120 OF 2026 IN FAST/15274/2024 AND 968 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11123 OF 2026 IN FAST/12206/2024 MADHAV RAMESH CHAUDHARI VERSUS 1 THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TAPI PATBANDHARE VIKAS MAHAMANDAL ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Ajeet Babanrao Kale. AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Mr. K. S. Patil, Ms. Vaishali S. Chaudhary, Ms. D. S. Jape, respectively. Advocates for Respective Respondents : Mr. R. A. Tambe, Mr. V.
V. Tarde, respectively. ... CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 24.09.2026 2026:BHC-AUG:44096
2 965-CA.11106-26 (965-968).odt PER COURT
:-
1. The civil applications have been filed by the claimants for withdrawal of amount deposited by the acquiring body in this Court, pursuant to the order passed on 12.09.2024 which is condition for granting stay. The acquiring body has deposited 80% of the amount as directed by this Court on 09.04.2026. Therefore, the claimants had filed the applications for withdrawal of amount. In the matters at serial No.965 - In view of the order passed by this Court, deposit the amount which is made a condition for grant of stay, the amount is deposited by the acquiring body. 2. In view of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the applicants, the claimants are permitted to withdraw 75% of the amount deposited by the acquiring body subject to the undertaking given by the claimants to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. Said undertaking shall be furnished within a period of four (4) weeks from today. 3. Learned advocates appearing for acquiring body opposes the withdrawal of the entire amount as claimed by the applicants. According to them, the enhancement is granted about 19 times of the rate granted by the SLAO. Therefore,
3 965-CA.11106-26 (965-968).odt considering the merits of the appeals, the withdrawal of entire amount should not be permitted. 4.
On the other hand, the learned advocate for the applicants submits that in identical matters, this Court had allowed the claimants to withdraw 75% of the total amount deposited by the acquiring body. In the present case, this Court had directed the acquiring body to deposit 80% of the amount under award. 5. Therefore, in view thereof, it would be appropriate to allow the applicants to withdraw 90% of the amount that is deposited by the acquiring body before this Court subject to furnishing an undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this court within a period of four (4) weeks from today. Rest of the amount shall be invested in the nationalized bank as per rules. 6. Civil applications for withdrawal are disposed of accordingly. (MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.) ... vmk/-