M/s Hari Krishna Exports v. Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh
WP/10297/2016 · 2026-10-04
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12457 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12457 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010680022016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10297/2016 Between:
1. M/S HARI KRISHNA EXPORTS,, REP. BY ITS PROP. M. NARASINHA RAO S/O MVN RAO, PERNAMITTA VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN
2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P., ONGOLE,PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATIONS, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE ASST DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATIONS, ONGOLE RURAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICE, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in
2
not considering the representation submitted for waiver of the additional charges, inspite of the repeated visits made by the petitioner, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondent authorities to waive the additional charges and to consider for conversion of Contract Load to LT 3-A category duly adjusting the excess bill amounts into future bills, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 12983 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the payment of additional charges of Rs. 99,785/- pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAUSHIK KUMBHAJADALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 2. V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APCPDCL)
3. JAGARLAMUDIKOTESWARIDEVI(SC FORAPSPDCL)
4. V V SATISH
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.10297 OF 2016 ORDER:
1. Ms. Udaya, learned counsel appeared virtual mode appearing for the petitioner seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date:-05.10.2026 BSM
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.10297 OF 2016
Date: 05-10-2026
W
BSM