ALOK KUMAR BHARTI ALIAS ALOK BHARTI ALIAS ALOK KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4160/2026 · 2026-05-14
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12450 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12450 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:14860] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4160 of 2026
------ Alok Kumar Bharti @ Alok Bharti @ Alok Kumar, aged about 30 years, Son of Arbind Kumar Bhagat @ Arbind Roy, Resident of Village- Basontroy Near Shiv Mandir, P.O. + P.S.- Basantrai, District- Godda, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-14-05-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No.228 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 316 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S.,
2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the Manager of the co-accused Rakesh Roshan and Rakesh Roshan has claimed himself to be a successful bidder in the tender of the I.R.C.T.C. having several vacancies and collected money for arranging jobs for the unemployed persons by taking Rs.30,000/- for paper work from each of the candidates. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-11 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against the co-accused Rakesh Roshan. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.03.2026 as has been mentioned in para-12 of the
instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No.228 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-14.05.2026-Animesh/