KAUSHAL SINGH @ KAUSHAL KUMAR v. THE ATATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4066/2026 · 2026-05-14
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12445 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12445 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:14934 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4066 of 2026
------ Kaushal Singh @ Kaushal Kumar, Aged about 28 years, S/o – Late Rupdev Singh, Resident of Village –Yamuna Nagar, Road No.5, Murla, Pahar, P.O.+P.S. –Sukhdeonagar, District – Ranchi.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Priyanshu Nilesh, Advocate For the State
: Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 14.05.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.218 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 305, 331(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft from the house of the informant and taken away ornaments worth Rs.3,00,000/- and cash of Rs.15,000/-. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused. It is further submitted that though charge has already been framed in this case but no witness has been examined so far. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.08.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 11.05.2026 in B.A. No. 3501 of
2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case
in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.218 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
14.05.2026
Sonu/