Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12444 (CHH)

JAGRIT KUMAR NETAM v. THE PRESIDENT

WPS/3384/2020 · 2026-02-23

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9603 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3384 of 2020 Jagrit Kumar Netam S/o Late Khemraj Netam Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Manki, Post Hadgahan , Tahsil Daundilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - The President Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Head Office, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon , District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Manager Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Head Office, G.E.Road , Rajnandgaon , District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Branch Manager Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank , Rajnandgaon , Branch Devri, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. PK Patel, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. NN Roy, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 24.02.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the death of petitioner’s father, he filed representation (Annexure-P/01) before the respondents-authorities for grant of compassionate appointment, but the same has not been decided till date. 3. Be that as it may, the concerned respondents-authorities are SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 directed to consider and decide petitioner’s said representation (Annexure-P/01) with regard to grant of compassionate appointment in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order preferably within 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No cost. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if