2026:JHHC:13928 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3863 of 2026 Rahul Tiwari @ Rahul Kumar Tiwari, aged about 34 years, son of Anand Kumari Tiwary, resident of village Baganpara, Harindanga Bazar, Post Office Pakur, Police Station Pakur (T), District Pakur, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Ms. Nitu Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Advocate --- 04/8th May 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No. 163 of 2024 [S.T. No. 49/2026] for the offence registered under Sections 352, 351(3), 61(2) and 3(5) of BNS and Section 25(1-B) (a), 26 and 35 of Arms Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier in B.A. No. 1330/2026 vide order dated 10.03.2026 at that stage. She submits that at that time, the matter was under investigation and consequently the charge was not framed. However, the charge has now been framed. She further submits that so far as the merit of the case is concerned, there is nothing against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged offence. She has also submitted that there is an allegation regarding threatening of the informant in connection with a previous case pending since 2013, but the petitioner has no concern at all with the said case. The petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party though has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2026:JHHC:13928 2 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge has already been framed and that the petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2026, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No. 163 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner shall not disturb the other witnesses of the case. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 08.05.2026 Uploaded On: 09.05.2026 Mukul/-