Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1244 (GAU)

RAHUL TANTI ALIAS RITTICK TANTI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Bail Appln./19/2026 · 2026-01-27

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010000922026 2026:GAU-AS:930 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./19/2026 RAHUL TANTI ALIAS RITTICK TANTI S/O LATE TUFAN TANTI, R/O DINJAN TEA ESTATE, P.O. DINJAN, P.S. TINSUKIA, DIST TINSUKIA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY LEARNED PP, ASSAM. 2:Sri Sanjib Kharia S/O Late Anil Kharia R/O Dinjan Tea Estate P.O Dinjan P.S. Tinsukia District Tinsukia ( Assam ) Pin 786189. Mobile 8135054185 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HASAN, MR. I K BURAGOHAIN,MR. A HASAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R 28.01.2026 Heard Mr. N. Hasan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 whereby the petitioner, namely- Rahul Tanti @ Rittick Tanti has prayed for regular bail in connection with Tinsukia P.S. Case No.418/2025. 3. Mr. Sharma has submitted that in this case, police has filed the charge sheet being C.S. No.05/2026 dated 21.01.2026. 4. Since the charge sheet has been filed, the petitioner is directed to approach the trial court for seeking regular bail. With the aforesaid direction, the bail application is closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant