Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12439 (ALL)

HEENA SHREE AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/40654/2026 · 2026-10-06

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40654 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner may implead the seller Pushpanjali as a respondent in the case during the course of the day. 2. The petitioners have purchased a property from the respondent no. 4 after taking due permission from the respondent no. 2 and 3. If there is any shortfall in the area then he can approach his seller or file a civil suit for the redressal of his grievance. 4. No interference is warranted. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 7, 2026 PK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manjari Singh, Rishabh Kumar, Sharad Chand Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Heena Shree And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad