Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12438 (CHH)

SMT. PARVEEN AKHTER v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/500/2025 · 2026-03-11

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:11831-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 500 of 2025 1 - Smt. Parveen Akhter W/o. Sheikh Nizamuddin, Aged About 56 Years R/o- Rahman Gali, Pathraguda, Veer Sawarkar Ward- 5, Jagdalpur, Dist- Bastar (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Shaheen Khan, W/o. Sheikh Irfanuddin Aadil, Aged About 29 Years R/o Rahman Gali, Pathraguda, Veer Sawarkar Ward No. 05, Jagdalpur, Dist.- Bastar (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Sho, Police Station- Jagdalpur, Dist. - Bastar (C.G.) 2 - Abdul Sattar Khan, S/o Late Abdul Rahman Khan, Aged About 54 Years R/o Rahman Gali, Pathraguda, Veer Sawarkar Ward No. 05, Jagdalpur, Dist- Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubham Dwivedi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Baghel, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 12.03.2026 1. Heard Mr. Shubham Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate for respondent No.1 / State. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.03.16 10:59:25 +0530 2 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “(I). That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ to set aside the impugned F.I.R bearing no. 0294/2025 dated 05/08/2025 registered at P.S-Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar u/ss. 296, 3(5), 351(2) of BNS against present petitioners, being apparently bad in law, and as such liable to be set aside by this Hon'ble court in the interest of justice. (ii). That, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give such other relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh stating that in the present matter, charge-sheet has already been filed against the petitioner and the same needs to be challenged further. 4. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse to law. 5. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State is present. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet