1 901-WP.2137-26 & ors (pro.).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 WRIT PETITION NO. 2137 OF 2026 THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR REGIONAL DHULE AND OTHERS VERSUS RATANJI GOPAJI GAVIT AND 1 WRIT PETITION NO. 2127 OF 2026 THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR REGIONAL DHULE AND OTHERS VERSUS SANYA VELJI GAVIT AND 2 WRIT PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2026 THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR REGIONAL DHULE AND OTHERS VERSUS TAKYA ALIAS PRABHU BALU GAVIT AND 3 WRIT PETITION NO. 2129 OF 2026 THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR REGIONAL DHULE AND OTHERS VERSUS KANTU RAMYA GAVIT AND 4 WRIT PETITION NO. 2155 OF 2026 THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR REGIONAL DHULE AND OTHERS VERSUS ASHOK SAKRYA MAVCHI AND 5 WRIT PETITION NO. 2156 OF 2026 THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR REGIONAL DHULE AND OTHERS VERSUS DILIP CHIMYA GAVIT 2 901-WP.2137-26 & ors (pro.).odt AND 6 WRIT PETITION NO. 2177 OF 2026 THE CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR REGIONAL DHULE AND OTHERS VERSUS JEMU JATRYA GAVIT ... Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Pandit Sushil Pushpendra. AGP for State Authorities : Mr. K. S. Patil. Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. R. Awhad h/f Mr. N. L. Chaudhari. ... CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 24.09.2026 PER COURT :- 1. The petitioners in all these writ petitions seek liberty to withdraw the writ petitions and the background of the fact that the writ petitions were filed against the interlocutory orders passed by the Industrial Court on order below Exh.U-15. According to the petitioners, now the complaint ULP itself has been disposed of. Therefore, Writ Petitions have become infructuous. 2. In view of the aforementioned background, the Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. (MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.) ... vmk/-