Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12434 (AP)

MADDI APPALA RAJU AND 2 OTHERS v. M.VENKATA RAO@ABHI(MARADA) AND ANOTHER

MACMA/2052/2018 · 2026-09-27

Sunitha Gandham

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010545752018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2052/2018 Between: 1. MADDI APPALA RAJU AND 2 OTHERS, S/O.APPA RAO, HINDU, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.27-3-57/3,NEAR RAGHAVENDRA PUBLIC SCHOOL, SRINAGAR, GAJUWAKA,VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. MADDI VARALAXRNI, W/O./MADDI APPALA RAJU, HINDU, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.27-3-57/3,NEAR RAGHAVENDRA PUBLIC SCHOOL, SRINAGAR, GAJUWAKA,VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. MADDI BALAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O.APPA RAO, HINDU, AGED 17 YEARS, ( MINOR REP. BY HIS FATHER APPELLANT NO.1 AND NATURAL GUARDIAN ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. M VENKATA RAOABHIMARADA AND ANOTHER, S/O. MARADA NARAYANA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, RIO. THOTAVALASA VILLAGE VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, RIO. D.NO.66- 1-33,PILAKAVANIPALEM, GAJUWAKA,VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, DWARAKANAGAR,VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Courtaggrieved by the orders passed by way of judgment and Decree in M.V.O.P.No.1247 of 2014, dated 14.06.2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal- Cum- XIII Additional District Judge, at Gajuwaka, the Appellants begs to prefer this appeal for the following IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 To condone the delay of 285 days in filing the appeal against the decree and judgment passed in MVOP.No. 1274 of 2014 dated 04-06-2017 on the file of the Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-XIII Additional District Judge,Gajuwaka and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. U P RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K MADHUSUDHAN REDDY 2. The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM I.A.No.1 of 2018 In/And MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2052 OF 2018 JUDGMENT: I.A.No.1 of 2018 is filed seeking condonation of delay of 285 days in filing MACMA.No.2052 of 2018. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. On the last adjournment also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2/Insurance Company is present. Petitioners are not showing inclination to proceed further and it shows that the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the petition. In the result, I.A.No.1 of 2018 is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2052 of 2018 is also dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J Dt:28.09.2026 Scs 4 118 HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM I.A.No.1 of 2018 In/And MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2052 OF 2018 Dated: 28.09.2026 SCS