Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010170622026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2338/2026 SRI DIPU DAS S/O SRI KANDARPA DAS R/O - VILL - BARBARI, LACHIMA , P.S - TIHU, DIST - NALBARI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR / ASSISTANT PUBLIC, PROSECUTOR OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S D ROY, R BARMAN,MS K DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 21.08.2026 1. Heard Mr. S. D. Roy, learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant and Ms. S. H. Borah, learned Addl. PP for the State of Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of bail to the accused applicant in connection with Tihu P.S. Case No. Page No.# 2/3 26/2026 registered under Sections 309 (4)/115/126/111 of BNS, 2023. 3. An FIR was lodged on 25.07.2026 by the complainant Md. Bilal Ali alleging inter alia that on 15.06.2026 at around 10.30 am, when the complainant reached at Nathkuchi Chowk, at that time, the accused persons namely, (i) Kapil Roy, (ii) Dipu Das, (iii) Tapan Roy and other two other persons of MD Associates Debit Collection Agency No.1 forcefully snatched his motor cycle bearing registration No. AS-15U-0753; that on 16.07.2026, the complainant deposited an amount of Rs.5,000/- on Phone Pay and Rs.5,000/- paid in cash to the accused namely, Kapil Roy but the accused persons did not return his motor cycle. It is also alleged that when the complainant went to the office of the accused persons to collect his motor cycle then the accused persons beaten him and snatched another amount of Rs.30,000/-. On the basis of the FIR, the police registered Tihu P.S. Case No. 26/2026 under the aforementioned sections. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant submits that the two of the accused persons, namely, Kapil Roy and Tapan Roy have already been granted bail by this Court. He further submits that the accused applicant has been behind the bar for 26 days since he was arrested on 26.07.2026. Therefore, the accused applicant should be granted bail, at this stage. 5. Taking into account the factual position and the period of detention already undergone by the accused applicant, this Court is of the considered opinion that the accused applicant should be granted bail, at this stage. 6. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused applicant, namely, Dipu Das shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with a suitable surety of like nature to the satisfaction of the learned JMFC, Tihu, Nalbari subject to the following conditions:- Page No.# 3/3 (i) That the accused applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and make himself available as and when called for by the investigating officer; and (ii) that the accused applicant shall not try to tamper or hamper with the investigation in any manner, whatsoever. 7. In terms of the above directions, the bail application stands disposed of. 8. Send back the Case Dairy. JUDGE Comparing Assistant