Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12424 (JHR)

KAUSHAL SINGH @ KAUSHAL KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4091/2026 · 2026-05-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:14849 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4091 of 2026 ------ Kaushal Singh @ Kaushal Kumar, aged about 28 years, s/o late Rupdev Singh, resident of Village-Yamuna Nagar Road No.5, Murla Pahar, P.O.+P.S.-Sukhdeonagar, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Priyanshu Nilesh, Advocate : Mr. Rahul Dev, Advocate For the State : Ms. Bandana Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 14.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.128 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 305/331(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of gold and silver jewellery worth Rs.5,00,000/-, cash of Rs.45,000/- from the house of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and charge sheet has been submitted in this case but as yet no witness has been examined. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the suspicion. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.08.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. Ranchi, in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.128 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 14.05.2026 Gunjan-