1 981-CA.1297-25 (981-986).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 981 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1297 OF 2025 IN FAST/2853/2025 LATE PRAKASH UTTAM RAJPUT THR. LRS JIJABAI PRAKAASH RAJPUT AND ORS VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER -2, UPPER TAPI PRAKALP (HATNOOR), JALGAON AND ANR AND 982 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1298 OF 2025 IN FAST/2855/2025 FAKIRA BHASKAR PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER -2, UPPER TAPI PRAKALP (HATNOOR), JALGAON AND ANR AND 983 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1299 OF 2025 IN FAST/2858/2025 LATE RAMA GAMBHIR PATIL THROUGH LRS SAMADHAN RAMA PATIL AND ORS VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER -2, UPPER TAPI PRAKALP (HATNOOR), JALGAON AND ANR AND 984 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1302 OF 2025 IN FAST/2845/2025 GULABRAO BABURAO PATIL VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, UPPAR TAPI PRAKALP HATNOOR, JALGAON AND ANR AND 985 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2832 OF 2025 IN FAST/5734/2025 AASIF SHAIKH RAJ MOHAMMAD VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT JALGAON AND ANR 2 981-CA.1297-25 (981-986).odt AND 986 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2833 OF 2025 IN FAST/5441/2025 SHAIKH UNUS SHAIKH MUSA VERSUS THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OF MINOR IRRIGATION, JALGAON AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav Moreshwar Bhokarikar AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Ms. Vaishali S. Chaudhary, Ms. D. S. Jape, Ms. Dr. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, Mr. K. S. Patil, Ms. P. V. Diggikar, respectively. Advocate for Respective Respondent : Ms. Kazi. ... CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 24.09.2026 PER COURT :- 1. By way of these civil applications, the applicants, who are the claimants are seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeals before this Court. The applicants are challenging the judgment and award passed by Civil Judge Senior Division, Amalner in respective LARs, which are partly allowed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Amalner. The reasons for delay are satisfactorily explained in the applications. The delay is not intentional and deliberate. 2. Learned advocate appearing for respondent No.2 Ms. Kazi opposes the applications for condonation of delay. After considering the reasons for delay as stated in the applications, 3 981-CA.1297-25 (981-986).odt the delay caused in filing the appeals deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. Considering the statutory right to file appeal available to the applicants, the civil applications are allowed by condoning the delay subject to the condition that the respective claimants shall file undertaking before this Court that they shall not claim any statutory interest and benefits for the delayed period. Such undertaking shall file within a period of eight (8) weeks from today to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial). 3. With the aforementioned observations, civil applications for delay are disposed of accordingly. (MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.) ... vmk/-