The Titan Township Associaiton, v. The District collector
WP/12389/2026 · 2026-03-30
Abdul Quddhose
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12423 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12423 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 12389 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 12389 of 2026 The Titan Township Associaiton, Represented by its President S. Karthikeyan ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 3. The Sub-Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 4. The Commissioner Hosur City Municipal Corporation, Bagalur Road, Hosur
5. The Tahsildar Taluk Office Building, Hosur Taluk, Hosur. ..Respondent(s) directing the Respondents herein to consider the pass orders on the petitioners Representation dated 13.12.2023 followed by the reminder Representation dated 13.08.2024 for taking appropriate action for constructing the proper drainage channel in the road connecting the petitioner association and Mathigiri situated in Survey No.136/1A and 137/1A. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 12389 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Sarath Kumar For Respondent(s): Ms.Bakkiyalakshmi Govt.Advocate Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to take appropriate action for constructing a proper drainage channel in the road connecting the petitioner association and Mathigiri, situated in S.No.136/1A and 137/1A, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. 2.The petitioner had given representations on 13.12.2023 and 13.08.2024 to the respondents for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3.Ms.Bakkiya Lakshmi, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representations, as stated supra, are considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents, produced by the petitioner association, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 12389 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representations. 6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the fourth respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representations dated 13.12.2023 and 13.08.2024 seeking for construction of the drainage channel in the road, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
No costs. 30-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VGA To
1. The District collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 3. The Sub-Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 4. The Commissioner Hosur City Municipal Corporation, Bagalur Road, Hosur. 5. The Tahsildar Taluk Office Building, Hosur Taluk, Hosur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 12389 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA WP No. 12389 of 2026 30-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis