IN T 112 Gurbachan Sh. Viraj S CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated this Court i State of Pun COCP-1798-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1798 of Date of decision : achan Singh Versus iraj Shyamkarn Tidke, IAS, Deputy C AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG P Mr. Sukhwinder Singh, Naib Teh I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 29.9.2025 (Annexure P-1) passe ourt in CWP-22230-2025 titled as “Gu of Punjab and others”, whereby it was ob “The Deputy Com has joined the court conferencing, states tha aforesaid mutations (i.e 25.11.2013, Mutation No Mutation No.1174 dated situated at Village Sik Tehsil and District reconstruction, and a Co to fix the responsibility regarding why the files a submits that the entir reconstruction of the file 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 798 of 2026 (O & M) sion :-20.04.2026 …..Petitioner uty Commissioner, Malerkotla …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ocate AAG Punjab assisted by aib Tehsildar, Malerkotla. has been filed alleging violation of passed by a co-ordinate Bench of s “Gurbachan Singh and others vs. was observed as follows :- Commissioner, Malerkotla, who urt proceedings through video s that the files pertaining to the (i.e. Mutation No.1139 dated n No.1169 dated 12.11.2014 and ted 16.6.2015 regarding the land Sikandarpura, Hadbast No.74, rict Malerkotla) are under a Committee has been constituted lity of the delinquent official les are not traceable. He further entire exercise concerning the files, as well as the fixation of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.27 19.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document has been ta Deputy Com mutations w from Shri S the mutatio Commission the petitione the reconstr needful and the present c learned cou disposed of April 20, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-1798-2026 (O & M) liability of the concerne within a period of four w final decision on the afor within a period of three w Learned counsel for the petitio een taken on the said mutations till d ty Commissioner had made a statement ions will be taken within three weeks. Learned counsel for the respo Shri Sukhwinder Singh, Naib Tehsildar, utations have been duly reconstructe issioner, Malerkotla before the Writ Co titioner, who has to apply to the concern constructed mutations. Learned counsel for the petition ul and in view of the statement made by esent contempt petition may be disposed Heard. In view of the facts noted above d counsel for the parties, the presen sed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 erned official, will be completed ur weeks from today, and that a aforesaid mutations will be taken ee weeks thereafter.” petitioner submits that no decision till date despite the fact that the ement that the decision on the said respondent-State, on instructions ildar, Malerkotla, has informed that structed as stated by the Deputy rit Court. It is submitted that it is ncerned office for getting copies of etitioner submits that he will do the de by learned counsel for the State, posed of as such. above and the submissions made by present contempt petition stands any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.27 19.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document