IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1542 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2024 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1. Raja Ram Paswan Son of Viswanath Paswan Resident of Village - Saraunja Dasai Tola, P.S. - Beerpur, Dist. - Begusarai. 2. Manoj Paswan Son of Late Baijnath Paswan R/o Village - Bhawandpur, Ward no. - 5, P.S. - Beerpur, Dist. - Begusarai. 3. Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Paswan Son of Gauri Paswan R/o Village - Bhawandpur, Ward no. - 5, P.S. - Beerpur, Dist. - Begusarai. 4. Manish Kumar @ Manish Choudhary @ DJ Bala Son of Late Arjun Chaudhary R/o Village - Bhawandpur, Ward no. - 5, P.S. - Beerpur, Dist. - Begusarai. 5. Sanjay Paswan Son of Dular Paswan R/o Village - Bhawandpur, Ward no. - 5, P.S. - Beerpur, Dist. - Begusarai. 6. Dipak Paswan @ Abhay Kumar @ Deepak @ Ajay Kumar Son of Ganga Ram Paswan R/o Village - Bhawandpur, Ward no. - 5, P.S. - Beerpur, Dist. - Begusarai. 7. Sandeep Paswan @ Sandeep Kumar Son of Ram Nathn Paswan R/o Village - Bhawandpur, Ward no. - 5, P.S. - Beerpur, Dist. - Begusarai. 8. Golu Paswan @ Ajay Kumar Son of Ganga Paswan R/o Village - Bhawandpur, Ward no. - 5, P.S. - Beerpur, Dist. - Begusarai. 9. Arvind Paswan Son of Khonu Paswan R/o Village - Saraunja, Dasai Tola, P.S. - Beerpur, Dist. - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sarvottam Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 11-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this criminal Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1542 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026 2/2 miscellaneous application with liberty to raise all the points as raised in this application, at the time of framing of charge, if not framed. 2. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. brajesh/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T