Govindaraj v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/8915/2026 · 2026-04-09
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12416 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12416 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 8915 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 8915 of 2026 Govindaraj S/o Yoganantham, Residing at No.7/1, Arasamata Pettai, Pay Arumugam Street, Vellore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by: The Inspector of Police Vellore North Police Station, Vellore District.Vellore ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in connection with Crime No.47 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. J.Prakasam For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal side)
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.02.2026 for the alleged offences under Section 103(1) of B.N.S. @ 191(2), 296(b), 103(1) read with 61(2) of B.N.S. in Cr. No.47 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 8915 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with A1 conspired together and murdered the victim, who is the brother of the defacto complainant and hence the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there are about 5 accused and the petitioner herein is A2, the son of the deceased. He would further submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case and he has been under incarceration since 26.02.2026 and hence prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
4. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would strongly objected the bail application stating that investigation is at preliminary stage and he would further submit that if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, it would jeopardise the investigation.
5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the
learned counsel on either side.
6. The contention of the learned Government Advocate cannot be ignored. Considering the totality of circumstances and upon the fact that the investigation is at preliminary stage, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at present. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 8915 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09-04-2026 MJS Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
1. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
2. The Inspector of Police, Vellore North Police Station, Vellore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 8915 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MJS CRL OP No. 8915 of 2026 09-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis