HABIB UR REHMAN MALANI AND ORS. v. NAIMULLAH KHAN S/O. AMANULLAH KHAN AND ORS.
CA/9672/2026 · 2026-09-24
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12415 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12415 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 907.CA-9672-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9672 OF 2026 IN FA/526/2026 HABIB UR REHMAN MALANI AND ORS. VERSUS NAIMULLAH KHAN S/O. AMANULLAH KHAN AND ORS. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 526 OF 2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2286 OF 2026 IN FA/526/2026 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9219 OF 2026 IN FA/526/2026 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9673 OF 2026 IN FA/526/2026 … Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Gulam Dastagir Shaikh Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Sushant V. Dixit And Mr. Khan Abdul Hakeem …
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT :
ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9673 OF 2026 :
1. The prayer in Civil Application No. 9673/2026 is to hear the appeal finally at the stage of admission.The appeal arises out of a temporary injunction order passed below Exhibit-5 in change report proceedings. Since the appeal arises out of an interim order, the request for hearing of the appeal at the admission stage deserves to be accepted.
2 907.CA-9672-2026.doc
2. Civil Application No.9673/2026 is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
3. List the First Appeal No. 526/2026 at the admission stage on 06.10.2026.
ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9672 OF 2026 :
4. Civil Application No. 9672/2026 is filed seeking production of documents. The application for change report has been filed by the Respondent in the appeal.
5. The learned Advocate for the Appellant opposes the application on the ground that the documents are not relevant for deciding the present appeal.
6. Civil Application No.9672/2026 is allowed. Permission is granted to produce the documents on record.
ROHIT W. JOSHI JUDGE NAJEEB..