Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12414 (RAJ)

AJAY KUMAR YOGI S/O SHRI MOOLCHAND JOGI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/287/2026 · 2026-08-17

Mahendar Kumar Goyal, Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:32412-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 287/2026 CNR: RJHC020768172026 | URN: HC / 775U / 2026 Ajay Kumar Yogi S/o Shri Moolchand Jogi, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Nai Colony, Khachariyawas, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Sikar. 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Dantaramgarh, District Sikar. 6. Jitendra Sen S/o Balchand Sen, R/o Nalot, P.s. Chitawa, District Sikar. 7. Shyam Lal Sen S/o Balchand Sen, R/o Jaipur. 8. Babulal Sen Son Of Kamla Devi Sen, R/o Khachariywas, P.s. Dantaramgarh, District Sikar. 9. Ramesh Sen Son Of Kamla Devi Sen, R/o Khachariywas, P.s. Dantaramgarh, District Sikar. 10. Ashish Sen Son Of Omprakash Sen, R/o Khachariyawas, P.s. Dantaramgarh, District Sikar. 11. Pradeep Sen Son Of Omprakash Sen, R/o Khachariyawas, P.s. Dantaramgarh, District Sikar. 12. Pankaj Sen S/o Murari Sen, R/o Khachariyawas, P.s. Dantaramgarh, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Neetu Singh Choudhary Ms. Shruti Singh Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Aman Agarwal, Ms. Neha Goyal, [2026:RJ-JP:32412-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-287/2026] Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma Mr. Sualal, SI, Ms. Geeta, MFC No. 1643, PS Dantaramgarh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 17/08/2026 Pursuant to order of this Court, Mr. Sualal, SI, assisted by Ms. Geeta, MFC 1643, PS Dantaramgarh, have produced Ms. "BS"before us. Indisputably, she is major. On interaction, she stated that she is residing with her parents and is not in illegal detention. She expressed her desire to go back to her parents. Since, Ms. "BS" is major, she is at liberty to go wherever she wants. On that premise, we dismiss this habeas corpus petition with a direction to the police authorities to leave her back to her parental home. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Chandan/8