Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12408 (ALL)

SONU v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/39863/2026 · 2026-10-04

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39863 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State. 2. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of charge- sheet dated 20.12.2018, cognizance/summoning order dated 13.08.2020, non-bailable warrant dated 04.08.2026 and the entire proceedings of Case No.6165 of 2020 (State of U.P. vs. Sonu) under sections 379, 411 IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.102 of 2018, P.S. Pipari, District- Sonbhadra, pending before learned court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra. 3. On perusal of entire record appended along with instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned charge-sheet, cognizance/summoning order, non-bailable warrant and the entire proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to non-bailable warrant dated 04.08.2026 to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, applicant is hereby directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned non-bailable warrant dated 04.08.2026 within three weeks from Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Kumar, Shrawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sonu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) today. Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law. 7. Lastly, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has already been granted bail and as such learned court concerned may not compel him to prefer fresh bond and surety. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. October 5, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 39863 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad