Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17212 RPFC No. 185 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.185 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
SRI. IMRAN A BHAGAVALE S/O ANWAR BHAGVALE AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS BUSINESSMAN PRESENTLY, R/O VIDYANAGAR IIND CROSS SHIVAMOGGA -577 203.
DISTRICT SHIVAMOGGA …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KAZI SALIM HASHAM SAHEB.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
SMT NASEEMA @ FOUZIYA KHAN W/O IMRAN A BHAGVALE AND D/O RAOF KHAN AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE R/O INDRA NAGAR 1ST CROSS SULEBYLU SHIVAMOGGA -577 203. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NAZEEMA - RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.11.2018 PASSED IN Crl.MISC.NO.130/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SHIVAMOGGA.
ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE.
Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17212 RPFC No. 185 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the petitioner and the respondent.
2. On perusal of the order sheet, it is observed that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was ordered to be listed for ‘dismissal’ and on several occasions the matter was adjourned. Today also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
GSR,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17