APHC010514552026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27958/2026 Between: 1. SRI SATYA SAI INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, A REGISTERED SOCIETY BEARING NO. 68/86, 11-2-16, DASAPALLA HILLS, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BOLISETTY SANTHARAM, S/O SRI B. PRABHAT KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RIO D.NO. 11-2-16, DASAPALLA HILLS, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530002. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM-530045. 4. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, VRO, YENDADA VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL AND VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530045 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 4th Respondent VRO, Yendada Village in attempting to demolish the compound wall of the Petitioner's land and trying to encroach into our land an extent of Ac.3.30 cents located in Survey No. 111 of Yendada Village as illegal, arbitrary, capricious, against principles of natural justice, and offending Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents, particularly the 4th Respondent, not to interfere with our peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property to an extent of Ac.3.30 cents located in Survey No. 111 of Yendada Village, not to further demolish the compound wall constructed around our educational institution IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents, particularly the 4th Respondent, not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac.3.30 cents located in Survey No. 111 of Yendada Village and not to demolish the compound wall constructed around the land Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ALLADI RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri Alladi Radhakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Chandra Sekhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner purchased an extent of Ac.1.65 cents each, in total Ac.3.30 cents in S.No.111 of Yendada village, Visakhapatnam District, under two registered sale deeds dated 28.03.1990. The petitioner constructed a compound wall after obtaining permission from the VUDA vide proceedings L.Dis.No.660/94-G4, dated 10.06.1994. Copy of sale deeds is filed as Ex.P1 and copy of building permission is filed as Ex.P2. Be that as it may, the respondents 3 and 4, without issuing any notice, are interfering with the above extent of land. 3. Sri Chandra Sekhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions of 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, would submit that the 3rd respondent is not interfering with an extent of Ac.3.30 cents in S.No.111. He would submit that the petitioner tried to encroach upon the adjoining land in S.No.110/5, admeasuring Ac.0.36 cents, which is classified as Poramboke – Vagu and is Government land. 4. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not encroach upon the land in S.No.110/5, which is classified as Poramboke – Vagu and is Government land. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into disputed questions of fact, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with a total extent of Ac.3.30 cents in S.No.111 of Yendada village, Visakhapatnam District, without following due process of law. The petitioner also shall not encroach upon land in S.No.110/5, admeasuring Ac.0.36 cents, which is classified as Poramboke – Vagu and is Government land. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD