Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12402 (AP)

ACHUTHA SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28061/2026 · 2026-09-30

B S Bhanumathi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010515702026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Thursday, the 1st day of October, 2026 Present Honourable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 28061 of 2026 Between: Achutha Satyanarayana ... Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: 1. Vardhineedi Sai Kiran Counsel for the respondents: 1. G.P. for Panchayat Raj Rural Dev 2. G.P. for Revenue The Court made the following: 2 BSB,J W.P. No.28061 of 2026 ORDER: The writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents Nos.7 & 8 in interfering with the construction of commercial building activities being carried out by the petitioner in Sy.No. 433 / 1 to an extent of 35 square yards situated in Pulla Village, Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru District, despite granting building permission dated 11.09.2026 by the respondent No. 8 in favour of the petitioner and without issuing any notice and without following due process of law as highly unjust, illegal and consequentially, direct the respondents Nos. 7 & 8 not to interfere with construction of the commercial building activities being carried out by the petitioner in the subject land. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent gram panchayat placed on record a copy of the written instructions of the respondent No. 8, admitting that the building permission had been granted to the petitioner with regard to the subject land and further that no notice had been issued to stop the construction activities. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested to dispose of the writ petition recording the written instructions as part of the order. 4. Sri D. Murali Babu, learned counsel requested time for filing a petition to implead villagers of Pulla Village as respondents to oppose the relief. Sri Pulicharla Venkata Krishna Rao, S/o. Raghavulu, gave a complaint on 03.07.2026 regarding the construction made by the petitioner without permission and causing obstruction to road transportation. 5. Subsequent to the aforesaid complaint, as permission was accorded to the petitioner for construction of the building, it is open for 3 BSB,J W.P. No.28061 of 2026 the complainant to raise any issue in that regard by taking appropriate legal course. As there has been no application filed for impleadment in this writ petition so far, the present writ petition cannot be adjourned, particularly in view of the remedy available to the complainant. 6. As such, the writ petition is disposed of by recording the written instructions as part of the order. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Date: 01.10.2026 Note: Issue C.C. by 05.10.2026 b/o. NSM 4 BSB,J W.P. No.28061 of 2026 24 Honourable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 28061 of 2026 Date: 01.10.2026 Note: Issue C.C. by 05.10.2026 b/o. NSM