Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12397 (BOM)

VENKAT MUKUNDRAO GARJE v. THE SANGLI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., AND OTHERS

WP/11722/2021 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 903.WP-11723-2021.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11723 OF 2021 VENKAT MUKUNDRAO GARJE VERSUS THE SANGLI URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11722 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11724 OF 2021 … Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Irpatgire A.N. Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Joshi Arvind Ramakant … CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT : 1. The learned Advocates jointly state that the borrower and the Bank have amicably arrived at a settlement of the dispute and, as such, the present petition filed by the Guarantor is rendered infructuous. 2. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner further states that the Respondent/Bank should be directed to take steps for removal of the entries with respect to its charge over the properties of the Guarantor in view of the settlement. The request is just and proper. 2026:BHC-AUG:43820 2 903.WP-11723-2021.doc 3. The Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous. 4. The Petitioner is directed to take steps for getting the entries with respect to income deleted, and the Respondent/Bank is directed to extend cooperation in that regard. ROHIT W. JOSHI JUDGE NAJEEB..