KAITHALA SUNIL KUMAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLRC/1342/2025 · 2026-09-29
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12396 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12396 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010613412025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1342/2025 Between:
1. KAITHALA SUNIL KUMAR, S/O LATE GOVINDA GOVINDA REDDY, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.4-42-19, KAITHALA VAARI VEEDHI, PEDA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
COURT OF A.P, AMARAVATHI. ...
RESPONDENT NO.1 2.
2. PADALA VENKATA KANAKA DURGA REDDY, S/O LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O 9-11-7/1/1, SIVAJI PALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toThe Petitioner herein begs to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision case aggrieved by the Docket Order Dt.22-11-2024, passed in CrI.M.P No.310 of 2024 in CrI.A Sr. No.1864 of 2024, on the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, against Order Dt. 11-08- 2023 passed in C.C No.280 of 2021, on the file of the III Special Magistrate Court, Visakhapatnam, for the following among other.
2
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay 235 days in filling the present CrI.R.C and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the Order Dt. 11-08-2023 passed in C.C No.280 of 2021, on the file of the III Special Magistrate Court, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above CrI.R.C. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V RAJA MANOHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
2. As process fee was not paid by the petitioner/accused/appellant, the learned Appellate Court dismissed the petition bearing Crl.M.P.No.310 of 2024 for default. Thereby, the Appeal was dismissed for default.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has suffered a major road accident and he is under treatment on the bed.
4. The
order, dated 22.11.2024 is hereby suspended and Crl.A.No.(SR).1864 of 2024 is restored on to file, subject to petitioner paying the process fee and also depositing 20% of the cheque amount before the learned Trail Court on or before 28.10.2026.
3
5. With the above observations, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 30.09.2026 KPV/GSN
4
109 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1342 of 2025 30.09.2026
KPV/GSN
5