Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12394 (GAU)

SRI PURANDAR DAS ALIAS PURNENDU DAS v. THE NF RAILWAY

AB/656/2026 · 2026-08-13

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010061982026 2026:GAU-AS:11533 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/656/2026 SRI PURANDAR DAS ALIAS PURNENDU DAS S/O- LATE RATNAKANTA DAS PERMANENT ADDRESS VILLAGE- BARBANG,P.O- BARBANG P.S- PATACHARKUCHI DISTRICT- BAJALI,ASSAM..- 781325PRESENT/OFFICE ADDRESS NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY GENERAL MANAGERS OFFICE CONSTRUCTION MALIGAON, GUWAHATI.H/NO-16, EAST GOTANAGAR, MALIGAON, ASSAM, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781011 VERSUS THE NF RAILWAY REPRESENTED BY SC, RAILWAY Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K K KALITA, MS. K BASUMATARY,MR. K UDDIN,T M LAHKAR,MS. G DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR H GUPTA(C.G.C.) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 14.08.2026 1. Heard Mr. K.K. Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. A. Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for Page No.# 2/2 the State of Assam as well as Mr. H. Gupta, learned CGC, Dy. SGI for the respondent, who submits that the matter has been charge sheeted, but the present petitioner has not been named as an accused in the said charge sheet. 2. Copy of the charge sheet has been furnished. 3. Place the same on the record. 4. In view of the above, the matter has become infructuous. 5. As such, this bail application stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant