Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010154302026 2026:GAU-AS:11580 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2517/2026 RAKESH BISWAS RO HAVILDAR, B BLOCK 136. NEAR 222 ABOD UNIT, SATGAON, SONAPUR SUB DISTRICT, KAMRUP M, 781027, PERMANENT RO AMBARPUR, NORTH 24 PARGANAS, MURIGHATA, WEST BENGAL 743251 VERSUS RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, RBI 11TH 22ND FLOOR, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI 400001, INDIA 2:THE OMBUDSMAN RBI CENTRALISED RECEIPT AND PROCESSING CENTRE CRPC RESERVE BANK OF INDIA 4TH FLOOR SECTOR 17 CHANDIGARH 160017 INDIA 3:SBI CARDS AND PAYMENT SERVICES LTD DLF INFINITY TOWERS TOWER C 12TH FLOOR BLOCK 2 BUILDING 3 DLF CYBER CITY GURGAON 122002 HARYANA INDIA 4:ICICI BANK LIMITED ICICI BANK TOWER Page No.# 2/3 NEAR CHAKLI CIRCLE OLD PADRA ROAD VADODARA 390 007 GUJARAT INDI Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S NEWAR, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B P BORAH, MR. P HAZARIKA BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI O R D E R 14.08.2026. Heard Ms. U. Duwara, learned counsel appearing for the applicant/petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.J. Dutta, learned counsel appearing in behalf of Mr. B.P. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3, Mr. P. Hazarika, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 & 2 and Mr. M. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4. It appears that on the last occasion i.e. 10.08.2026, upon Mr. B.P. Bora, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 submitting that unintentionally there was a deduction, however the same has been resorted back into the account of the petitioners, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner who was accommodate to obtain instructions from the applicant as whether the unintentional deduction has been resorted back to the account of the petitioner or not, today when the matter is called, Ms. U. Duwara, learned counsel submits that the said deduction has already restored back in the account of the writ petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, nothing survives for adjudication of the instant interlocutory application, the same is closed as being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant