SAYYED SADEK SAYYED MUKHTAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
BA/1738/2026 · 2026-09-21
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12389 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12389 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
7nobBA1738-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1738 OF 2026 Sayyed Sadek Sayyed Mukhtar Vs. State of Maharashtra … Mr. Manish P. Tripathi, Advocate for applicant Mrs. A. S. Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 21st September, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that during pendency of the present application, the investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed. On instructions, he seeks leave to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial court with copy of the charge sheet. Leave granted.
2. The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh Application along-with charge-sheet before the learned Trial Court.
3. If the applicant prefers the fresh bail application, the trial court shall consider the same on its own merits.
(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 1 of 1