Grandhi Sudhakara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/8872/2026 · 2026-10-05
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12383 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12383 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE NO: Crl.P.No.8872 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. NO. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
01. 06.10.2026 MRK, J
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and seeks time to get instructions.
3. Issue notice to unofficial respondent No.2.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondent No.2 through Speed Post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry.
5. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the case against petitioner No.1 (A1) with liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with law. He also endorsed to that effect.
6. Accordingly, permission is accorded.
SL. NO. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
7. Having regard to the
facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the
submissions of
learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner Nos.2 and 3 (A2 & A3) are the old aged parents, aged about 66 years and 56 years and are suffering with ailments and petitioner No.4 (A4) is the married brother of Accused No.1 and the allegations leveled against the petitioners is generic in nature, and also taking note of the well settled principle held in Geddam Jhansi and Another Vs. State of Telangana and Others1, there shall be interim stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.145 of 2026 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Gajapathinagaram, for a period of eight (08) weeks.
8. List on 24.11.2026.
_______
MRK, J RMR
1 2025 SCC OnLine SC 263