Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(2026:JHHC:14902) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4096 of 2026
Ujjwal Kumar, aged about 37 years, son of late Shateesh Kumar Pandey @ Satish Kumar Pandey, resident of Road No. 1, Ramnagar Bagbera Colony near Nehru School, Jamshedpur, PO & PS – Bagbera, District – East Singhbhum. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 14th May, 2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sidgora P.S. Case No. 112 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was engaged by Global Rist Management Services for verification of documents and allegedly forwarded forged and fabricated documents relating to 200 customers on the basis of which, company processed a large number of loans, which caused a loss of about rupees seven crores on the basis of recommendation report submitted by the petitioner. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 25 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.03.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate – 1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Sidgora P.S. Case No. 112 of 2024, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 14.05.2026 Aditi