*1* 49revn198o25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 198 OF 2025 AJIT MOTIRAM VARPE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Shri Savant Vilas P., Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M.A. Aher, APP for the Respondents/ State. Shri Wagh Pradip Karbhari, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 28 September 2026 P. C. :- 1. After hearing the learned advocate for the applicant for some time, when this Court had shown disinclination to entertain the instant revision application, the learned advocate sought a pass-over to take instructions. 2. After taking instructions, the learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant revision application. 3. The matter was extensively argued by the learned APP in order to point out how the instant revision application is not maintainable. Therefore, this Court records appreciation as 2026:BHC-AUG:44226 *2* 49revn198o25 regards the submissions made by the learned APP Shri Aher. 4. Since the learned advocate for the applicant is withdrawing the revision, therefore, this Court is not giving detailed reasons justifying dismissal of the revision application. 5. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Application is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. However, it is made clear that the Court below shall not be influenced by dismissal of the revision application and shall proceed with the matter in accordance with law. kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )