Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1237 (RAJ)

RAJULAL S/O BAPULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3283/2026 · 2026-03-30

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13351] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3283/2026 Rajulal S/o Bapulal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Madanpuriya Police Station Ghatoli, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.) ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 30/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 47/2026 registered at Police Station Aklera District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8, 21 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family and behind bars ever-since 20.01.2026. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and quantity recovered is much less than the commercial quantity. It is also submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:13351] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3283/2026] 4. Having heard the contentions made by the counsel representing both the parties, upon a perusal of the material available on record and taking note of the fact that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family and behind bars ever-since 20.01.2026; that charge-sheet has been filed; that the quantity recovered is much less than the commercial quantity; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant and looking to the overall facts and circumstances, but without commenting upon the merits/demerits the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Rajulal S/o Bapulal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /103