2026:HHC:9395-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7858 of 2022. Date of decision: 30.03.2026. _____________________________________________________________________________ Praveen Kumar and others ...Petitioners. Versus Union of India and others …Respondents. ____________________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 _____________________________________________________________________________ For the Petitioners. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate, vice Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India (Senior Advocate) with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 3 to 5-State. __________________________________________________________ Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge In view of subsequent events, i.e., issuance of office order dated 28.03.2026, regarding promotion/posting of the petitioners, grievances of the petitioners stand redressed in pursuance to directions 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:9395-DB CWP No. 7858 of 2022 passed by the Court and, accordingly, present petition is disposed of, being infructuous. 2. Petition is disposed of accordingly, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), Judge. 30th March, 2026 (Susheel)